A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning possible neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated countrywide consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a very publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to build their family home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their preparing permission by developing a wall outside of the boundaries of their website, leading to an encroachment with a Exclusive Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, notably in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, that's partly constructed, is in the correct placement. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced during the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-superior drinking water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that come to be emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather visual proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times documented, describing how The 2 Gentlemen entered the h2o for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this sort of actions were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being protected intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as readers sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read even further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and ailments connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental safety and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their very long-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Spot of Conservation and say that every one works are already carried out determined by Experienced guidance and permitted plans. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental points.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal web-site has become a shorthand description for any condition that many observers see as progressively frequent. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning non-public land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier pointed out which the businessman had previously been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly diverse Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of midsection-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Given that Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains uncertain. The court need to ascertain whether or not the wall as built complies with preparing authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning conditions. Yet the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay along with each other extensive following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems which include environmental defense and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether or not it can ultimately be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will depend on the court’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.