A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, look for to build their family members home. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of established people. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining built by their prospective neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted beneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their planning authorization by building a wall beyond the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment over a Distinctive Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result locations are topic to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal surroundings which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which is partially created, is in the right posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal organizing disputes, the place views of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Times, a picture which has given that grow to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they have been intended to Acquire visual proof of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how the two Adult males entered the water all through extreme weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm drinking water to photograph the website turned one of the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall extended into a region afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been coated intimately through the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as visitors sought to be familiar with the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders must be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main of the dispute is often a disagreement around boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage that the wall, as constructed, goes further than what was accepted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling files, maps, and ailments attached towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their action is motivated by worry for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair just endeavoring to produce a household dwelling in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Specific Space of Conservation and say that all works are carried out dependant on Experienced advice and accepted strategies. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as entering The ocean for the duration of a storm, usually do not change the fundamental facts.
The case has also lifted broader questions about how planning disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about construction of wall at coastal web site happens to be a shorthand description for your situation that many observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, Paul Feely and Rene Collier general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily actuality with the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays uncertain. The court should decide whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living together with each other lengthy once the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. What's more, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will depend upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin recently.